JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.
Vieraskieliset / In-english

Blog: Work – a source of joy and happiness?

Vieraskieliset / In-english
27.6.2022 6.00

Juttua muokattu:

7.6. 09:52
2022060709523220220627060000

Text: Vau­la Es­ke­li

Trans­la­ti­on: Sirk­ka-Lii­sa Lei­no­nen

Pe­op­le are hap­py about many dif­fe­rent things. Work is one thing that ma­kes them hap­py and con­tent. Work is more than just a sour­ce of in­co­me. It has mul­tip­le me­a­nings to all of us.

Our mo­ti­va­ti­on to work and our con­tent­ment with the tasks as­sig­ned to us de­pend on va­ri­ous fac­tors: en­jo­yab­le wor­king con­di­ti­ons, good at­mosp­he­re at work, good so­ci­al re­la­ti­ons with col­le­a­gu­es, and sa­la­ry. Furt­her cha­rac­te­ris­tics of a good workp­la­ce inc­lu­de com­pe­tent ma­na­ge­ment, con­fi­den­ti­al in­ter­per­so­nal re­la­ti­ons, po­si­ti­ve re­cog­ni­ti­on of wor­kers, and op­por­tu­ni­ties for self-de­ve­lop­ment and ca­reer pro­mo­ti­on. Wor­king pe­op­le should feel ap­p­re­ci­a­ted and use­ful­ly ca­pab­le both wit­hin their own wor­king com­mu­ni­ty and in so­cie­ty. At its best, work can make life me­a­ning­ful, alt­hough work in it­self does not make any­bo­dy hap­py. As in all life, there are both good days and bad days at work.

Many of us re­mem­ber our child­hood dre­ams of what we wis­hed to be­co­me as grown-ups. For some, the dre­ams of what they wan­ted to do in adult life may come true, but qui­te of­ten dream jobs chan­ge as the per­son grows ol­der and gains ex­pe­rien­ce.

My work has been so­met­hing that I dre­a­med about as a child and have al­so li­ked as an adult. It has ful­fil­led my needs and de­si­res. When I was ap­p­lying to my first study prog­ram, the in­ter­vie­wer as­ked what would hap­pen if I did not get ac­cep­ted. I re­mem­ber I res­pon­ded with great de­ter­mi­na­ti­on that I would re-ap­p­ly as many ti­mes as ne­ces­sa­ry to get in­to the prog­ram. I got ac­cep­ted that first time. La­ter on, I stu­died for anot­her pro­fes­si­on, and now that I am close to re­ti­re­ment, I have oc­ca­si­o­nal­ly wor­ked with tasks that are al­most si­mi­lar to my first job.

I dis­cus­sed with some ac­qu­ain­tan­ces their work ca­reers, how they li­ked their work, and what fac­tors cont­ri­bu­ted to their li­king or nor li­king their jobs. The sig­ni­fi­can­ce and va­lue of work seem to be slight­ly dif­fe­rent bet­ween the ol­der ge­ne­ra­ti­ons and yo­un­ger pe­op­le. The post-war ge­ne­ra­ti­on self-evi­dent­ly ap­p­re­ci­a­ted di­li­gen­ce and de­vo­ti­on to work. Gai­ning a suf­fi­cient in­co­me could re­qui­re a lot of work at that time. Pa­ren­tal at­ti­tu­des of­ten shape yo­ung pe­op­le’s at­ti­tu­de to­ward schoo­ling and ca­reer choi­ces. En­cou­ra­ge­ment re­cei­ved at home may help the child to ap­p­re­ci­a­te the va­lue of school work and the con­se­qu­ent op­por­tu­ni­ties la­ter in life. Skil­ls le­arnt at home are va­lu­ab­le when a yo­ung per­son mo­ves away from home to live in­de­pen­dent­ly.

The dif­fe­ren­ce in mo­dern pe­op­le’s com­mit­ment to work is ref­lec­ted in that they do not al­wa­ys con­ti­nue in the same job and in the same workp­la­ce un­til re­ti­re­ment. Many pe­op­le study for a new pro­fes­si­on as adults, and pe­op­le ea­si­ly chan­ge jobs. It al­so tur­ned out in the dis­cus­si­ons that jobs felt to be in­te­res­ting and ver­sa­ti­le were con­si­de­red more re­war­ding. It is im­por­tant to feel that one’s work is me­a­ning­ful. This ma­kes wor­kers com­mit­ted and con­tent. Wor­king in­vol­ves a bles­sing that is va­lu­ab­le in dai­ly life.

An ex­ces­si­ve work bur­den, on the ot­her hand, is harm­ful for our phy­si­cal and psyc­hic he­alth. Conf­licts in the work com­mu­ni­ty and over­wor­king cau­se stress and fa­ti­gue and im­pair wor­king ca­pa­ci­ty.

A friend of mine, who is a mot­her, men­ti­o­ned that pa­rents need to find good ways to re­con­ci­le the needs of child­ren and the re­qui­re­ments of work. When the child­ren are small and gro­wing up, the si­tu­a­ti­ons wit­hin the fa­mi­ly keep chan­ging and take a he­a­vy toll on the pa­rents’ re­sour­ces. She is a stay-at-home mot­her and said she does the per­for­man­ce eva­lu­a­ti­on ses­si­ons with her­self.

A pa­rent who ta­kes care of their child­ren at home is a spe­ci­a­list of child care and re­a­ring. They de­ser­ve ap­p­re­ci­a­ti­on but al­so fi­nan­ci­al sup­port from so­cie­ty. We cons­tant­ly hear about de­mands for equ­a­li­ty. But we can­not be equ­al in all things. God has gi­ven dif­fe­rent du­ties to mot­hers and fat­hers. Yet, there is enough work and res­pon­si­bi­li­ty in a fa­mi­ly to be sha­red by two pe­op­le, and sha­ring helps them to ma­na­ge eve­ry­day fa­mi­ly life. The work done at home is in­dis­pen­sab­le for child­ren’s wel­fa­re, even so that pro­fes­si­o­nal ro­les and so­ci­al sta­tus are me­a­ning­less when the pa­rents see their child­ren as uni­que gifts.

The mul­tip­le me­a­nings of work are cru­ci­al­ly im­por­tant re­gard­less of whet­her we are tal­king about sa­la­ried work out­si­de home or child care and ot­her care-gi­ving done at home. Fa­mi­ly care-gi­vers have the de­man­ding res­pon­si­bi­li­ty to care for a spe­ci­al-needs child, an in­va­lid or an el­der. In my own work I have en­coun­te­red el­der­ly pe­op­le who take care of their spou­se and want to do most of that work by them­sel­ves. A lady who was ne­ar­ly eigh­ty on­ce said warm­ly that she felt her work to be a la­bor of love that she wan­ted to do with the strength that she was gi­ven.

I have some per­so­nal ex­pe­rien­ce of wor­king as a fa­mi­ly care-gi­ver. I sub­bed for the mot­her of a spe­ci­al-needs child du­ring her days off. The va­lue of that work did not come from the fi­nan­ci­al com­pen­sa­ti­on but from the joy that this spe­ci­al child brought in­to our home du­ring those wee­kends.

When I think about the dif­fe­rent as­pects of work, I can­not help al­so thin­king about unemp­lo­y­ment and the fac­tors that li­mit the abi­li­ty to work. Ap­p­re­ci­a­ti­on of work is of­ten emp­ha­si­zed. Busy pro­fes­si­o­nals may not al­wa­ys re­a­li­ze that. Yet, unemp­lo­y­ment can be a dep­res­sing and des­pe­ra­te ex­pe­rien­ce. Both sing­le pe­op­le and pa­rents wor­ry about their li­ve­li­hood and of­ten feel an­xie­ty. If the si­tu­a­ti­on per­sists, there may al­so be pres­su­re from out­si­ders. An unemp­lo­yed per­son may ex­pe­rien­ce cri­ti­cism and disc­ri­mi­na­ti­on. There are al­so pe­op­le unab­le to work due to he­alth prob­lems. Being dif­fe­rent from the mainst­re­am should not make any­bo­dy feel in­fe­ri­or. We are all equ­al­ly va­lu­ab­le be­fo­re God’s ey­es. I hope none of us wants to inc­re­a­se any­bo­dy’s bur­den. The Bib­le inst­ructs us to car­ry each ot­her’s bur­dens and to help those who need help (Gal. 6:2).

I hang my was­hing on the line

white, black, co­lor­ful.

I hang a child’s shirts,

a yo­ungs­ter’s fa­vo­ri­te hoo­die,

a tab­le cloth made by my mot­her,

socks knit by my mot­her-in-law.

I look at the marks of life,

all this

gi­ven to me.